Security & Governance

Enterprise-grade means provable, not promised.

In Europe, an AI deployment is only as real as its governance. From December 2027 the EU AI Act's high-risk obligations apply, the GDPR never stopped applying, and your board is already asking where the data goes. This service turns those questions into architecture.

The stakes

Governance is now the gate to shipping.

Candidate matching in staffing is classified high-risk under the EU AI Act. Care organisations answer to NEN 7510 alongside the GDPR. Finance, insurance and the public sector each carry their own regimes. In every one of these sectors the pattern is identical: the pilot that treated compliance as a final checkbox dies at review, and the deployment that designed for it ships. Retrofitting governance costs more than designing it. Every time.

What the service covers

From classification to audit-ready operations.

EU AI Act readiness.

Classification of your use cases against the Act's risk categories, mapping of the obligations that follow, and the documentation, transparency and oversight measures the high-risk tier demands from December 2027.

GDPR and data residency.

Where prompts, context and outputs live, what leaves the EU and under which safeguards, and the honest configuration of model and platform options against your data-protection requirements. Your DPO gets architecture, not assurances.

Governance framework and policy.

Who may deploy what, who approves which actions, how incidents are handled and how usage is monitored: a working operating model sized for your organisation, not a shelf document.

Audit and accountability.

Logging, traceability and evaluation designed so that every consequential action a Claude system takes can be explained to a regulator, a customer or your own board, after the fact and under pressure.

Is our use case high-risk under the EU AI Act?
It depends on function, not industry: anything touching employment decisions, essential services access, credit or similar categories is likely in scope, and candidate matching explicitly is. Classification is the first deliverable of this service, in writing, with the reasoning shown.
What actually changes in December 2027?
The Act's obligations for high-risk systems become applicable: risk management, data governance, technical documentation, human oversight, accuracy and robustness requirements, and registration duties. If a system you run falls in scope, the time to design for it is before the deadline, not after the first enquiry.
We already have a DPO and a security team. What do you add?
We work under them, not around them. What we bring is the Claude-specific depth: how these obligations map onto model behaviour, MCP access, agent actions and platform configuration, so your existing governance owners can sign off on evidence rather than trust.

Make compliance your unfair advantage.

While competitors stall at review, a deployment designed for EU rules ships. A senior consultant will walk your situation within one working day.